Follow Blame it on the Voices on Twitter | Blame it on the Voices on Facebook
If you liked this post, you can
subscribe to the Blame It On The Voices RSS feed and get your regular fix
If you liked this post, you can
subscribe to the Blame It On The Voices RSS feed and get your regular fix
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comentarii:
Someone needs to learn some basic math.
Women scoring a 0 on "looks" for men means a total score of whatever the intelligence+humor+money equals....
Where was a man scoring a 0 on "looks" for women means a total score of 0 for the woman.
It's actually the oppiste
It should be the opposite. No woman would want to be with a good looking man if hes stupid or not rich. Men have long proved they can be with a good looking woman even if shes dumb and doesn't get his jokes.
This is very right indeed.
I agree with the pictured equations on how most men and women judge the opposite sex. I think differently though. I go with a woman's looks^1.5+intelligence*2+humor*0.5.
HAHAHA it's funny because all men care about is looks! The joke is that men are shallow! SO FUNNAY
women are more shallow and don't believe for a moment that don't go for looks first. that's b.s. he must look good ! have great teeth and fir a laundry list of other things. It's just that's it's perceived this way in culture that all a man wants or needs is looks from a woman . Perhaps for young men this is true but not for older men who know the score
@Marco
Wait, wouldn't it be:
woman's looks^(1.5+intelligence)*2+humor*0.5?
Or do you give women a free 1.5 for the heck of it?
But a woman's score only goes up to ten... So if she scored 10 and 10 and 10 then shed have a total of 200. Makes no sense.
You could fix it so that you took the mean of
Looks (/10) + Intelligence(limited to 5) + Humour(limited to 5)
Then youd get a value of 10 or less. Problem solved and priority weight given to looks.