Cool. I gotta say I'm particularly concerned by the negative feedback on youtube. "Brainwashing Greenpeace is still insisting in this CO2 emission mambojambo." I just can't believe this whole lobby of the past few years about the lack of human impact on global warming - that it has convinced so many people that nothing is wrong and that no drastic changes must be made. Everywhere, including VW. I'm just afraid that we'll go down in history as the people that could've saved so much of this planet, but didn't.
Or maybe it's because of the preponderance of evidence to the contrary of AGW http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/
And due to the fact that it's a gov't control meme http://www.google.com/search?q=daily+bell+global+warming&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=
And due to the fact that Wall St. would have been the chief beneficiary of anti-AGW legislation http://thetaildoesnotwagthedog.blogspot.com/search?q=global%20warming
But, Dave, then it also surprises me that Wall St. didn't jump into something they could make money from. The argument works...neither way, then. And despite the 'contrary evidence', the number of scientists (from all kinds of disciplines, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change) believing in AGW is kind of astounding. And as long as there's a general consensus along scientists it seems foolish for us, non-specialists, to start believing the contrary.
4 comentarii:
Cool. I gotta say I'm particularly concerned by the negative feedback on youtube.
"Brainwashing Greenpeace is still insisting in this CO2 emission mambojambo."
I just can't believe this whole lobby of the past few years about the lack of human impact on global warming - that it has convinced so many people that nothing is wrong and that no drastic changes must be made. Everywhere, including VW.
I'm just afraid that we'll go down in history as the people that could've saved so much of this planet, but didn't.
Yeeaaahh...
Or maybe it's because of the preponderance of evidence to the contrary of AGW http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/
And due to the fact that it's a gov't control meme http://www.google.com/search?q=daily+bell+global+warming&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=
And due to the fact that Wall St. would have been the chief beneficiary of anti-AGW legislation http://thetaildoesnotwagthedog.blogspot.com/search?q=global%20warming
Just sayin'...
But, Dave, then it also surprises me that Wall St. didn't jump into something they could make money from. The argument works...neither way, then. And despite the 'contrary evidence', the number of scientists (from all kinds of disciplines, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change) believing in AGW is kind of astounding.
And as long as there's a general consensus along scientists it seems foolish for us, non-specialists, to start believing the contrary.
i don't understand the error message i get sometimes:
http://vwdarkside.com/fr/jedi/guillaume-combes-82019
do you?
thx