Follow Blame it on the Voices on Twitter | Blame it on the Voices on Facebook
If you liked this post, you can
subscribe to the Blame It On The Voices RSS feed and get your regular fix
![](http://pics.blameitonthevoices.com/062011/30ubalh[1].gif)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comentarii:
Someone needs to learn some basic math.
Women scoring a 0 on "looks" for men means a total score of whatever the intelligence+humor+money equals....
Where was a man scoring a 0 on "looks" for women means a total score of 0 for the woman.
It's actually the oppiste
It should be the opposite. No woman would want to be with a good looking man if hes stupid or not rich. Men have long proved they can be with a good looking woman even if shes dumb and doesn't get his jokes.
This is very right indeed.
I agree with the pictured equations on how most men and women judge the opposite sex. I think differently though. I go with a woman's looks^1.5+intelligence*2+humor*0.5.
HAHAHA it's funny because all men care about is looks! The joke is that men are shallow! SO FUNNAY
women are more shallow and don't believe for a moment that don't go for looks first. that's b.s. he must look good ! have great teeth and fir a laundry list of other things. It's just that's it's perceived this way in culture that all a man wants or needs is looks from a woman . Perhaps for young men this is true but not for older men who know the score
@Marco
Wait, wouldn't it be:
woman's looks^(1.5+intelligence)*2+humor*0.5?
Or do you give women a free 1.5 for the heck of it?
But a woman's score only goes up to ten... So if she scored 10 and 10 and 10 then shed have a total of 200. Makes no sense.
You could fix it so that you took the mean of
Looks (/10) + Intelligence(limited to 5) + Humour(limited to 5)
Then youd get a value of 10 or less. Problem solved and priority weight given to looks.